The Recruitment Race: Why Slow and Steady Wins the Hiring Game

We’ve all heard the saying ‘good things come to those who wait’, but when it comes to recruitment, that saying couldn’t be more true.

In this article, we delve into why taking your time in the hiring process can lead to better results for both employers and candidates.

Recruitment isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. It’s not a process that you can rush and expect to yield quality results. Unfortunately, in today’s fast-paced business world, many companies are under pressure to fill vacancies as quickly as possible, even if that means sacrificing quality. And while many recruitment agencies boast about their ability to send over CVs within hours, the truth is that this approach is a recipe for disaster. In this article, we’ll explore why good recruitment takes time, and why it’s worth it in the end.

Finding the right person for the job

At the heart of good recruitment is the art of finding the right person for the job. This isn’t something that can be accomplished overnight. It takes time, skill, and patience. The best recruiters know that it’s not just about matching a job description to a CV. It’s about understanding the company culture, assessing motivation, testing commitment, and looking beyond the surface-level qualifications to find the right fit. These are things that simply can’t be accomplished in a 24- or 48-hour timeframe.

Unfortunately, many companies and recruiters fall into the trap of believing that quick recruitment is the key to success. They think that by sending over a high volume of CVs, they’ll increase their chances of finding the right person. But the truth is that this approach often leads to wasted time, frustrated candidates, and ultimately, a bad hire. Anyone can match a job description to a CV, but that’s not real recruitment. The art of recruitment lies in understanding the nuances of the role, the company, and the candidate. It takes time, and it requires a commitment to quality over quantity.

So why is it that so many companies are still fixated on speed over quality?

One reason is that they see the vacancy as a gap that needs to be filled as soon as possible. But this is a short-sighted view that doesn’t take into account the long-term impact of a bad hire. A bad hire can cost a company time, money, and talent, all of which could have been avoided by taking the time to find the right person.

Another reason is that many recruitment agencies measure their success based on how fast they can send over CVs. But this is a flawed metric that doesn’t take into account the quality of the candidates being sent. A good recruiter will aim to get it right the first time, even if it means taking a little longer. This approach may require the employer to wait an extra couple of weeks for candidates, but the quality will be better. Candidates will show up for interviews, understand the company culture and values, and be less likely to leave. This results in time-saving overall.

Good recruitment is worth the wait

In conclusion, the art of good recruitment is not about speed, but about quality. It’s about taking the time to understand the role, the company, and the candidate, and finding the right fit. Quick recruitment may seem like a good idea in the short term, but it’s a dangerous game of chance that could end up costing you time, money, and talent in the long run. So the next time a recruiter promises to fill your vacancy within 24 hours, remember that good recruitment takes time, and it’s worth the wait.

Be sure to tune in to the latest episode of Nobody Likes Recruiters for more insight and advice on the art of good recruitment and why it takes time.

If you would like to discuss a vacancy with our recruitment team – please get in touch on 01782 489784.